Credit: Found On Internet

I seem to spend my life being compared to the lead singer of Coheed & Cambria (it's the hair), but have purposefully not sought them out, so I proclaim ignorance when people compare me to them.

Wow! They are a lot lighter then I expected. Like playful battle metal, made by big fella that sings a little like a chipmunk.  Very rock/pop - No World for Tomorrow is following the yellow brick road, totally metal munchkin rock.

'Feathers' - this song is utterly unlistenable, Avril Lavigne is heavier at times.
'Mother Superior' is like listening to a Jack Black tune, it then occurs to me this is a new age Iron Maiden isn’t it? Tongue slightly in cheek, and the tracks are being played for kicks, no matter how low brow they can go.

'Good Apollo, I'm Burning Star IV, Vol. 2: No World For Tomorrow', a mouthy title and the second concept album on a story. What story that is I haven’t quite sussed, It would sound good as new soundtrack to the 80’s Ulysses TV series.

Some of the guitar playing is virtuoso to the extreme, with 'Gravemakers & Gunslingers', and the break in the title track 'No World for Tomorrow' being mind-boggling. But on the whole, it's just not that tasteful. "Yes, but it is prog rock!" I hear you cry, but prog can still be tasteful. I feel the need to point out the album – Prog Is Not A Four Letter Word as an example.

To own or not to own, that is the question. If you like Maiden if you like mind boggly guitar bits - yep.